<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explorer 8300HD Multi-Room DVR &#8211; ReplayTV Does it Better!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.replaytvblog.com/2005/05/24/explorer-8300hd-multi-room-dvr-replaytv-does-it-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.replaytvblog.com/2005/05/24/explorer-8300hd-multi-room-dvr-replaytv-does-it-better/</link>
	<description>The World of DVR's with a ReplayTV Slant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu,  5 Jul 2007 05:03:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: site admin</title>
		<link>http://www.replaytvblog.com/2005/05/24/explorer-8300hd-multi-room-dvr-replaytv-does-it-better/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>site admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 21:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.replaytvblog.com/?p=40#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure about the 8300HD MR acting as both a client and a server. I don&#039;t get the impression from the Scientific Atlanta website that it can -- at least not yet with the current software. Plus, I&#039;m sure that even if it can, our wonderful cable companies will be sure to charge a much higher price for the main 8300HD than they will for the additional client only units.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure about the 8300HD MR acting as both a client and a server. I don&#8217;t get the impression from the Scientific Atlanta website that it can &#8212; at least not yet with the current software. Plus, I&#8217;m sure that even if it can, our wonderful cable companies will be sure to charge a much higher price for the main 8300HD than they will for the additional client only units.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bienstock</title>
		<link>http://www.replaytvblog.com/2005/05/24/explorer-8300hd-multi-room-dvr-replaytv-does-it-better/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bienstock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 16:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.replaytvblog.com/?p=40#comment-82</guid>
		<description>I wonder: can a 8300HD MR unit act as both a client and a server?  If so, you&#039;d get a bit closer to the RTV capability.  You still couldn&#039;t schedule a recording on another box or pick up a show from where you&#039;ve left off, but you would be able to record locally in diferent locations, which is a help when multiple shows are on at the same time.  You&#039;ll need it next Fall when Survivor, Joey, Alias, The OC, Smallville and Everyone Hates Chris (the new Chris Rock series) are all on opposite each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder: can a 8300HD MR unit act as both a client and a server?  If so, you&#8217;d get a bit closer to the RTV capability.  You still couldn&#8217;t schedule a recording on another box or pick up a show from where you&#8217;ve left off, but you would be able to record locally in diferent locations, which is a help when multiple shows are on at the same time.  You&#8217;ll need it next Fall when Survivor, Joey, Alias, The OC, Smallville and Everyone Hates Chris (the new Chris Rock series) are all on opposite each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
